1 |
Stephen Bennett <spb@g.o> posted 448EF724.8010709@g.o, |
2 |
excerpted below, on Tue, 16 May 2006 17:41:24 +0000: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Alec Warner wrote: |
5 |
>> I would prefer to see the profile you are commiting then; do you have a |
6 |
>> link? |
7 |
> |
8 |
> I haven't written it yet. |
9 |
|
10 |
Herein lies the crux of the problem, IMO. Regardless of all the other |
11 |
arguments made, I simply cannot believe it is reasonable to ask that |
12 |
Gentoo devs give their blessing to add to the tree something that hasn't |
13 |
yet even been written, let alone tested not to break anything with |
14 |
existing portage. |
15 |
|
16 |
I /am/ a bit skeptical that the solution as proposed would cause the sorts |
17 |
of breakage some people seem to think it will. I /am/ cautiously |
18 |
supportive of the proposal as outlined, provided it has been reasonably |
19 |
tested as as an overlay or locally imposed tree structure, and that there |
20 |
is a way for devs to independently test it themselves, but this? It's not |
21 |
written yet, yet devs are being asked to support its addition live tree, |
22 |
sight unseen, upon some description of a proposal of what it /might/ look |
23 |
like? |
24 |
|
25 |
Someone requested a patch, here worded as an overlay request, that devs |
26 |
(and users who want to risk their necks <g> I'd strongly suggest |
27 |
verifying the backups are updated and testing them previous to trying it) |
28 |
could try, before a yeah or nay is given to the act of actually adding it |
29 |
to the tree. I believe that to be a reasonable request. |
30 |
|
31 |
Meanwhile, and possibly eliminating the need for the separate profiles, |
32 |
the virtual/portage idea seems worthy of consideration, as others have |
33 |
pointed out, quite independent of what other choices are eventually |
34 |
offered. pkgcore or something else could find it equally helpful, and it |
35 |
won't hurt to build in that flexibility now. |
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
39 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
40 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
41 |
|
42 |
-- |
43 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |