| 1 |
On Wed, 17 May 2006 16:28:21 +0000 (UTC) |
| 2 |
"Duncan" <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Herein lies the crux of the problem, IMO. Regardless of all the other |
| 5 |
> arguments made, I simply cannot believe it is reasonable to ask that |
| 6 |
> Gentoo devs give their blessing to add to the tree something that |
| 7 |
> hasn't yet even been written, let alone tested not to break anything |
| 8 |
> with existing portage. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
The initial request was for any objections to the principle. Since |
| 11 |
people asked for a concrete example of what was going in, I provided it. |
| 12 |
-- |
| 13 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives