| 1 |
On Wednesday 17 May 2006 18:56, Stephen Bennett wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 17 May 2006 16:28:21 +0000 (UTC) |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> "Duncan" <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Herein lies the crux of the problem, IMO. Regardless of all the other |
| 6 |
> > arguments made, I simply cannot believe it is reasonable to ask that |
| 7 |
> > Gentoo devs give their blessing to add to the tree something that |
| 8 |
> > hasn't yet even been written, let alone tested not to break anything |
| 9 |
> > with existing portage. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> The initial request was for any objections to the principle. Since |
| 12 |
> people asked for a concrete example of what was going in, I provided it. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
This request was such as to judge the advantages of adding it to the tree. |
| 15 |
This would allow judgement and weighing of the advantages and disadvantages. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Paul |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 21 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 22 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 23 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives