Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] /usr vs. initramfs redux
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 20:57:00
Message-Id: robbat2-20110810T205039-112248631Z@orbis-terrarum.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] /usr vs. initramfs redux by Dale
1 On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 03:47:18PM -0500, Dale wrote:
2 > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:49:38AM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
3 > >> I am concerned about /var being included in this because of the
4 > >> potential of filling up the root partition.
5 > > Err, I don't follow. How does mounting /var fill up the root partition?
6 >
7 > If you take /var off its own partition and put it on /, then it will
8 > fill up / instead of /var. Filling up /var, not the end of the world.
9 > Filling up / is a bad thing.
10 [snip]
11 That is clear, but entirely irrelevant to my question. I _explicitly_
12 support /var on a partition, that's why my entire initramfs proposal
13 included it.
14
15 I want to know what William had _against_ the mounting /var in my
16 proposal, because that is what his statement implied.
17
18 --
19 Robin Hugh Johnson
20 Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead
21 E-Mail : robbat2@g.o
22 GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] /usr vs. initramfs redux Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>