1 |
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 03:47:18PM -0500, Dale wrote: |
2 |
> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:49:38AM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: |
3 |
> >> I am concerned about /var being included in this because of the |
4 |
> >> potential of filling up the root partition. |
5 |
> > Err, I don't follow. How does mounting /var fill up the root partition? |
6 |
> |
7 |
> If you take /var off its own partition and put it on /, then it will |
8 |
> fill up / instead of /var. Filling up /var, not the end of the world. |
9 |
> Filling up / is a bad thing. |
10 |
[snip] |
11 |
That is clear, but entirely irrelevant to my question. I _explicitly_ |
12 |
support /var on a partition, that's why my entire initramfs proposal |
13 |
included it. |
14 |
|
15 |
I want to know what William had _against_ the mounting /var in my |
16 |
proposal, because that is what his statement implied. |
17 |
|
18 |
-- |
19 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
20 |
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead |
21 |
E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
22 |
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 |