Re: [gentoo-dev] Introducing the Proctors - Draft Code of Conduct for Gentoo

[George Prowse]

Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 16:00 +0100, Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen wrote:
>
>>> Uhh, no.  This gets enforced on devs and users alike.
>>>
>> I wouldn't bring it up in the first place, but we've had previous examples
>> with devs calling other devs not so kind things and to my knowledge it didn't
>> result in any action. I seem to remember a rather active dev taking it not so
>> lightly, resulting in one less dev and no action from Devrel/Council.
>>
>
> What exactly do previous examples have to do with us saying that our
> past efforts didn't work and our trying to come up with a *new* way of
> doing these things to not repeat past problems/mistakes?
>
> Let me just clarify this.
>
> We don't care how things were done in the past.  We are looking
> *forward* and trying to come up with the best solution from here on out.
>
>
>>> I look at anything with a gentoo.org address as our house.  While some
>>> might disagree with this statement, I'm pretty sure this is the stance
>>> we're taking on it.
>>>
>> So this doesn't apply to the Gentoo IRC channels?
>>
>
> *sigh*
>
> I wasn't aware that I would have to spell out everything.  How about
> this, then?
>
> EVERYTHING with gentoo.org or #gentoo-* in it?  Is that good enough?
>
> (Looking forward to the day when we don't have to be so damned pedantic
> in everything that we write.)
>
>
I would like to point you #4 in the CoC draft - "*Being judgmental,
mean-spirited or insulting.* It is possible to challenge someone
(respectfully, of course), in a way that empowers without being
judgemental."

;) George


-- 
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list