| 1 |
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 16:00 +0100, Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen wrote: |
| 2 |
> > Uhh, no. This gets enforced on devs and users alike. |
| 3 |
> I wouldn't bring it up in the first place, but we've had previous examples |
| 4 |
> with devs calling other devs not so kind things and to my knowledge it didn't |
| 5 |
> result in any action. I seem to remember a rather active dev taking it not so |
| 6 |
> lightly, resulting in one less dev and no action from Devrel/Council. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
What exactly do previous examples have to do with us saying that our |
| 9 |
past efforts didn't work and our trying to come up with a *new* way of |
| 10 |
doing these things to not repeat past problems/mistakes? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Let me just clarify this. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
We don't care how things were done in the past. We are looking |
| 15 |
*forward* and trying to come up with the best solution from here on out. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> > I look at anything with a gentoo.org address as our house. While some |
| 18 |
> > might disagree with this statement, I'm pretty sure this is the stance |
| 19 |
> > we're taking on it. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> So this doesn't apply to the Gentoo IRC channels? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
*sigh* |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
I wasn't aware that I would have to spell out everything. How about |
| 26 |
this, then? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
EVERYTHING with gentoo.org or #gentoo-* in it? Is that good enough? |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
(Looking forward to the day when we don't have to be so damned pedantic |
| 31 |
in everything that we write.) |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 35 |
Release Engineering Strategic Lead |
| 36 |
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams |
| 37 |
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee |
| 38 |
Gentoo Foundation |
Archives