Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Dependencies on system packages
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 07:08:01
Message-Id: 20061217070429.126d8364@snowdrop
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Dependencies on system packages by Jason Stubbs
1 On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 15:10:57 +0900 Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o>
2 wrote:
3 | I've tried to be objective here so if my viewpoint isn't obvious I'll
4 | state it outright. I think all packages should depend on every
5 | package that they need to build and/or run. Whether this is done
6 | explicitly or with meta-packages, I don't really care. The only
7 | reason for not being explicit with deps is to cater for old sloppy
8 | versions of portage. Unless there are other reasons not stated here?
9
10 If you mandate that, any package using autotools will need around fifty
11 new entries in DEPEND.
12
13 --
14 Ciaran McCreesh
15 Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org
16 Web : http://ciaranm.org/
17 Paludis is faster : http://ciaranm.org/show_post.pl?post_id=61

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Dependencies on system packages Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o>