| 1 |
On 9/20/15 1:23 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
>> [0] I am pretty sure some arches will want to opt out of this |
| 4 |
>> scheme, at least for some more critical packages. |
| 5 |
> ALLARCHES shouldn't be used on critical packages. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
Exactly. So suppose that we do stabilize a non-critical package on an |
| 9 |
arch where it fails. We'll get a bug report for it and then deal with |
| 10 |
the issue. Its not ideal, i know, but it seems an acceptable compromise |
| 11 |
given manpower shortage. We tossed around an earlier version of the |
| 12 |
idea in ppc/ppc64 when we were struggling for manpower and we were |
| 13 |
getting council pressure to drop to ~arch. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. |
| 17 |
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] |
| 18 |
E-Mail : blueness@g.o |
| 19 |
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA |
| 20 |
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA |
Archives