1 |
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 19:54:47 +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 01:29:55PM -0400, Peter wrote: [snip] |
4 |
>> This kernel source will not cause Armageddon to arrive, cause smoke to |
5 |
>> issue from your power supply, nor interfere with other ebuilds. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> That's funny. Did you just claim that a sys-kernel/*-sources ebuild with |
8 |
> the patch-sets listed below would have no possibility of interfering with |
9 |
> other ebuilds? If so, you've just proven my point that many users wont be |
10 |
> able to judge how ebuilds from overlays may affect the stable tree. |
11 |
> |
12 |
|
13 |
I did. Sources don't affect anything. The ck-sources are in the tree, and |
14 |
there is dire warning associated with them. Only the -mm sources have any |
15 |
sort of warning. If a user CHOOSES to use a hacked up kernel, then they |
16 |
obviously choose to. Just like, if a user chooses to try out reiserfs-4, |
17 |
they get what they pay for. Sources don't affect anything. |
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
> "Features |
21 |
> -ck(s) Con Kolivas Patchset, (server version available as option) -ide |
22 |
> libATA/ide updates, Alsa updates and fixes, Dothan Speedstep, Pentium M |
23 |
> undervolt, IBM ACPI fan control, Suspend2, vesafb-tng, reiser4, unionfs |
24 |
> squashfs, realtime-lsm, fbsplash, configurable mouse polling support, |
25 |
> custom dsdt, Layer7, various fixes and updates." [1] |
26 |
> |
27 |
>> Am I being to simplistic or naive? |
28 |
> |
29 |
> Both, it seems. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> Regards, |
32 |
> Brix |
33 |
> |
34 |
> [1]: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103354#c51 |
35 |
|
36 |
And I think these are worthwhile features. Some, actually are part of the |
37 |
gentoo-base and gentoo-extra patches (see the excludes list). It also |
38 |
includes spocks vesa-tng and fbsplash. |
39 |
|
40 |
Look, you can't micro-control all aspects of a user's computing |
41 |
experience. If someone downloads tmpwatch and mistakenly puts / in the |
42 |
list of directories to prune, what will you do? Put tmpwatch into |
43 |
package.mask because it MIGHT be misued? Or, will you package.mask |
44 |
vixie.cron because someone may not be capable of writing a bash script? |
45 |
|
46 |
Honestly, I do not see the difference, AND because the kernel is |
47 |
experimental (or, at least I call it experimental), and widely followed, I |
48 |
think Sunrise is ideal for it. JM2C. |
49 |
|
50 |
-- |
51 |
Peter |
52 |
|
53 |
|
54 |
-- |
55 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |