From: | Henrik Brix Andersen <brix@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: A heretical thought? Blessing project sunrise as an almost-fork. | ||
Date: | Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:37:36 | ||
Message-Id: | 20060613183027.GF18732@osgiliath | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: A heretical thought? Blessing project sunrise as an almost-fork. by Peter |
1 | On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 02:14:24PM -0400, Peter wrote: |
2 | > I did. Sources don't affect anything. The ck-sources are in the tree, and |
3 | > there is dire warning associated with them. Only the -mm sources have any |
4 | > sort of warning. If a user CHOOSES to use a hacked up kernel, then they |
5 | > obviously choose to. Just like, if a user chooses to try out reiserfs-4, |
6 | > they get what they pay for. Sources don't affect anything. |
7 | |
8 | I rest my case. |
9 | |
10 | ./Brix |
11 | -- |
12 | Henrik Brix Andersen <brix@g.o> |
13 | Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: A heretical thought? Blessing project sunrise as an almost-fork. | Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: A heretical thought? Blessing project sunrise as an almost-fork. | Steev Klimaszewski <steev@g.o> |