Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o>
To: joerg.schaible@×××.de
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy for bugs because of use flags
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 23:02:24
Message-Id: 20041111225957.0a635084@snowdrop.home
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Policy for bugs because of use flags by "Jörg Schaible"
1 On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 23:49:42 +0100 Jörg Schaible <joerg.schaible@×××.de>
2 wrote:
3 | please let me know, since when do we have a bug policy for "standard
4 | accepted safe use flags"? I don't expect any developer to test a
5 | variety of different use flags, but what if a user reports, that a
6 | package is seriously broken because of a use flag? In former times a
7 | critical flag was just filtered out in the ebuild, but why is such a
8 | thing fix now rejected ?
9
10 Are you talking about USE flags or CFLAGS? If you mean USE flags, it
11 used to be the case that no combination should cause a failure, but
12 nowadays certain developers are making things barf in pkg_setup instead
13 (which IMO sucks, since any failure of this kind should happen *before*
14 all the dependencies start to be merged).
15
16 If you mean CFLAGS, you won't have any problems if you stick with a nice
17 sane set (on the rare occasions when sensible CFLAGS do cause problems,
18 they're generally filtered). If you use stupid CFLAGS, expect things to
19 break. Anyone using -ffast-math globally, for example, deserves
20 everything they get...
21
22 --
23 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, Sparc, Mips)
24 Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org
25 Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy for bugs because of use flags Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
[gentoo-dev] Re: Policy for bugs because of CFLAGS (was: use flags) "Jörg Schaible" <joerg.schaible@×××.de>