1 |
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 23:49:42 +0100 Jörg Schaible <joerg.schaible@×××.de> |
2 |
wrote: |
3 |
| please let me know, since when do we have a bug policy for "standard |
4 |
| accepted safe use flags"? I don't expect any developer to test a |
5 |
| variety of different use flags, but what if a user reports, that a |
6 |
| package is seriously broken because of a use flag? In former times a |
7 |
| critical flag was just filtered out in the ebuild, but why is such a |
8 |
| thing fix now rejected ? |
9 |
|
10 |
Are you talking about USE flags or CFLAGS? If you mean USE flags, it |
11 |
used to be the case that no combination should cause a failure, but |
12 |
nowadays certain developers are making things barf in pkg_setup instead |
13 |
(which IMO sucks, since any failure of this kind should happen *before* |
14 |
all the dependencies start to be merged). |
15 |
|
16 |
If you mean CFLAGS, you won't have any problems if you stick with a nice |
17 |
sane set (on the rare occasions when sensible CFLAGS do cause problems, |
18 |
they're generally filtered). If you use stupid CFLAGS, expect things to |
19 |
break. Anyone using -ffast-math globally, for example, deserves |
20 |
everything they get... |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, Sparc, Mips) |
24 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
25 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |