| 1 |
On 17 September 2012 21:58, Ciaran McCreesh |
| 2 |
<ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 21:48:07 +0800 |
| 4 |
> Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
>> On 17 September 2012 20:41, Ciaran McCreesh |
| 6 |
>> <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 7 |
>> > On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 19:49:12 +0800 |
| 8 |
>> > Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o> wrote: |
| 9 |
>> >> Or, even easier and more straightforward: just keep using *DEPEND. |
| 10 |
>> >> The case hasn't been made yet why we need to change that in the |
| 11 |
>> >> first place. |
| 12 |
>> > |
| 13 |
>> > We're looking at something like eight *DEPEND variables in EAPI 6, |
| 14 |
>> > with considerable overlap between them all. |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> And like now, in the great majority of cases, only two or three will |
| 17 |
>> be used. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> And even now, people are using COMMON_DEPEND to work around *DEPEND |
| 20 |
> duplication. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Yes, and that works just fine. I don't see what's wrong with that... |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Cheers, |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Ben | yngwin |
| 28 |
Gentoo developer |
| 29 |
Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin |
Archives