| 1 |
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 21:48:07 +0800 |
| 2 |
Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On 17 September 2012 20:41, Ciaran McCreesh |
| 4 |
> <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 19:49:12 +0800 |
| 6 |
> > Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
> >> Or, even easier and more straightforward: just keep using *DEPEND. |
| 8 |
> >> The case hasn't been made yet why we need to change that in the |
| 9 |
> >> first place. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > We're looking at something like eight *DEPEND variables in EAPI 6, |
| 12 |
> > with considerable overlap between them all. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> And like now, in the great majority of cases, only two or three will |
| 15 |
> be used. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
And even now, people are using COMMON_DEPEND to work around *DEPEND |
| 18 |
duplication. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives