Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Security/QA Spring Cleaning
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 20:50:03
Message-Id: 20060523204409.GD14671@nightcrawler
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Security/QA Spring Cleaning by Ned Ludd
1 On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 04:22:30PM -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
2 > And now per arch breakdowns.
3 > http://gentooexperimental.org/~ferringb/reports/arch-vulnerabilities/
4
5 Couple more reports generated (in the parent dir, dropped keywords,
6 imlate, packages that have just ~arch, ebuild metadata verification,
7 and "ebuild has been unstable for arch X for greater then N days).
8
9 Any other requests in terms of report generation, give
10 a yell. The bzr repo for it is at
11 http://gentooexperimental.org/~ferringb/bzr/test-runner/
12
13 Adding a new test is easy enough- or if you're after making it pretty
14 (feel free to, not my cup 'o tea), go nuts- the reports started out as
15 just testing of the GLSA vulnerable pkgset in pkgcore.
16
17 Reports are regenerated every 4 hours- patrick would be the one to ask
18 about making it more frequent.
19
20 ~harring

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Security/QA Spring Cleaning Thomas Cort <tcort@g.o>