1 |
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 15:28:06 -0700 Donnie Berkholz |
2 |
<spyderous@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
| On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 17:23 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
4 |
| > Personally, I think the groups should be well defined and quite |
5 |
| > specific. After all, we are simply trying to reduce the number of |
6 |
| > things a person needs to configure in make.conf, not make it so a |
7 |
| > person can USE="@GNOME" and expect it to give them everything they |
8 |
| > would want(or are we?) for a Gnome desktop. I think if we were |
9 |
| > going to do that, then our best bet would be to start using profiles |
10 |
| > to add a bunch of stuff. After |
11 |
| > all, /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2004.3/desktop/gnome |
12 |
| > sounds like a winner. |
13 |
| |
14 |
| This is a great idea. I brought it up to lanius the other day, looking |
15 |
| for a place to default to on with USE=ppds. desktop/make.defaults |
16 |
| would be ideal. |
17 |
|
18 |
Stick it in @DESKTOP. Remember that cascading profiles don't do multiple |
19 |
inheritance. |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, Sparc, Mips) |
23 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
24 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |