| 1 |
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 7:36 AM, Daniel Campbell <zlg@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Given that the push for kdbus is more a political API move than |
| 4 |
> anything, I can see eudev sticking to the current interface and |
| 5 |
> working just fine. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I doubt udev is going to make that switch until kdbus is merged into |
| 8 |
the kernel. I doubt that Linus will accept it simply over politics. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Once it is in the mainline kernel, why wouldn't the eudev maintainers |
| 11 |
switch? At that point just about anybody using dbus is going to be |
| 12 |
making a switch to kdbus. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Not using kdbus will be like not using /proc. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Rich |
Archives