| 1 |
Jakub Moc wrote: |
| 2 |
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Sat, 9 Sep 2006 21:28:10 +0100 Roy Marples <uberlord@g.o> |
| 4 |
>> wrote: |
| 5 |
>> | On Saturday 09 September 2006 21:25, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: |
| 6 |
>> | > Drupal has had QA bug #98542 open for over a year now, and has seen |
| 7 |
>> | > no progress in resolving it. It has now been package.masked, and |
| 8 |
>> | > unless someone jumps up to fix the outstanding issues will be |
| 9 |
>> | > removed in 30 days. |
| 10 |
>> | |
| 11 |
>> | Unless anyone else steps up, I'll take it as I use Drupal for my home |
| 12 |
>> | site. |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> Given Drupal's history, is it really worth maintaining it in the tree? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> I don't think so. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Upstream completely sucks and keeps changing the tarballs silently over |
| 19 |
> and over again, so the only solution to the above bug is to remove all |
| 20 |
> of the modules/themes/etc. from the ebuild. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
So which sucks, upstream or our unbending policy? |
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives