1 |
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Doug Goldstein <cardoe@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> > I'm wondering what exactly is the harm in letting developers idle for a |
5 |
> > while? While they might not be actively committing they are still |
6 |
> > knowledgeable people that are just as capable as everyone else to push in |
7 |
> a |
8 |
> > fix for small packages. There's lots of bugs in bugzilla with items that |
9 |
> > just need someone active to commit them. There's even a lot of these |
10 |
> items |
11 |
> > are filed by retired Gentoo developers who could have easily pushed this |
12 |
> fix |
13 |
> > for all users. The fact that someone only does one commit a year does not |
14 |
> > marginalize their contribution. While it may be small it is improving the |
15 |
> > overall quality of the distro. I'm constantly seeing developers getting |
16 |
> > upset over getting pushed out. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> The problem comes when $idle_dev has XX bugs assigned to them and they |
19 |
> don't get resolved and no one else knows that there are issues. Then |
20 |
> users get the attitude that they shouldn't even file bugs because no |
21 |
> one fixes them and they just sit there. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> So, I agree with you as long as $idle_dev doesn't pretend to maintain |
24 |
> packages and the team that they belong to doesn't consist of people of |
25 |
> the same activity level. (rendering the team useless too). |
26 |
> |
27 |
> 2 cents, |
28 |
> -Jeremy |
29 |
> |
30 |
> |
31 |
So let's re-assign the bugs to m-needed and not nuke the person. |