1 |
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Doug Goldstein <cardoe@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> I'm wondering what exactly is the harm in letting developers idle for a |
3 |
> while? While they might not be actively committing they are still |
4 |
> knowledgeable people that are just as capable as everyone else to push in a |
5 |
> fix for small packages. There's lots of bugs in bugzilla with items that |
6 |
> just need someone active to commit them. There's even a lot of these items |
7 |
> are filed by retired Gentoo developers who could have easily pushed this fix |
8 |
> for all users. The fact that someone only does one commit a year does not |
9 |
> marginalize their contribution. While it may be small it is improving the |
10 |
> overall quality of the distro. I'm constantly seeing developers getting |
11 |
> upset over getting pushed out. |
12 |
|
13 |
The problem comes when $idle_dev has XX bugs assigned to them and they |
14 |
don't get resolved and no one else knows that there are issues. Then |
15 |
users get the attitude that they shouldn't even file bugs because no |
16 |
one fixes them and they just sit there. |
17 |
|
18 |
So, I agree with you as long as $idle_dev doesn't pretend to maintain |
19 |
packages and the team that they belong to doesn't consist of people of |
20 |
the same activity level. (rendering the team useless too). |
21 |
|
22 |
2 cents, |
23 |
-Jeremy |