Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Developer Retirements
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 18:55:30
Message-Id: 90b936c0903091155q4895badcn298d6a84b7acbc64@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Developer Retirements by Doug Goldstein
1 On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Doug Goldstein <cardoe@g.o> wrote:
2 > I'm wondering what exactly is the harm in letting developers idle for a
3 > while? While they might not be actively committing they are still
4 > knowledgeable people that are just as capable as everyone else to push in a
5 > fix for small packages. There's lots of bugs in bugzilla with items that
6 > just need someone active to commit them. There's even a lot of these items
7 > are filed by retired Gentoo developers who could have easily pushed this fix
8 > for all users. The fact that someone only does one commit a year does not
9 > marginalize their contribution. While it may be small it is improving the
10 > overall quality of the distro. I'm constantly seeing developers getting
11 > upset over getting pushed out.
12
13 The problem comes when $idle_dev has XX bugs assigned to them and they
14 don't get resolved and no one else knows that there are issues. Then
15 users get the attitude that they shouldn't even file bugs because no
16 one fixes them and they just sit there.
17
18 So, I agree with you as long as $idle_dev doesn't pretend to maintain
19 packages and the team that they belong to doesn't consist of people of
20 the same activity level. (rendering the team useless too).
21
22 2 cents,
23 -Jeremy

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Developer Retirements "Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <hkBst@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Developer Retirements Doug Goldstein <cardoe@g.o>