| 1 |
then again, -hpa supports the tsize option which is required for booting |
| 2 |
off the pxe stack (popular), and netkit does not support this option. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
--Justin |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
On Sun, 2003-10-19 at 12:44, Heinrich Wendel wrote: |
| 7 |
> On Sunday 19 October 2003 19:28, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 8 |
> > On Sun, 2003-10-19 at 10:19, Heinrich Wendel wrote: |
| 9 |
> > > Hi, |
| 10 |
> > > |
| 11 |
> > > We currently have netkit-tftpd, aftpd and tftp-hpa. I think a |
| 12 |
> > > virtual/tftpd would be a good idea, each should have a block on |
| 13 |
> > > virtual/tftpd, as i can see no reason for installing two tftp servers, |
| 14 |
> > > and they all install "/usr/sbin/in.tftpd". See also bug #25440, what do |
| 15 |
> > > you think? |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > I think it is a very good idea. This way ebuilds could just depend |
| 18 |
> > against the virtual. Which do you plan on making the default? My vote |
| 19 |
> > is with tftp-hpa. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> I would vote for netkit-tftp as it also has support for mips (not sure though |
| 22 |
> if mips is still officially supported by gentoo). |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> mfg, Heinrich |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> -- |
| 27 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives