Archives
Archives
| From: | James Broadhead <jamesbroadhead@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds | ||
| Date: | Fri, 09 Mar 2012 18:04:02 | ||
| Message-Id: | CA+hid6Eof+Q_94v01FD36bCkUYLeMb+pBjk-3cObEJ2Aa1sPTQ@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds by Michael Orlitzky |
||
| 1 | On 9 March 2012 17:31, Michael Orlitzky <michael@××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 | > At any rate, I'm now convinced that we all want GLEP 55, but with a |
| 3 | > different name. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | I think that moving the data to the filename is probably a better |
| 6 | approach than semi- or repeat parsing, but I prefer preserving the |
| 7 | .ebuild extension, and think that eapi should be specified similarly |
| 8 | to ebuild revision, as a suffix. for instance: |
| 9 | |
| 10 | app-foo/bar-1.0.0-r1.ebuild # EAPI0 (or the highest EAPI prior to the |
| 11 | new schema) |
| 12 | app-foo/bar-1.0.0-r1-e1.ebuild |
| 13 | app-foo/bar-1.0.0-r1-e99.ebuild |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds | Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds | Michael Orlitzky <michael@××××××××.com> |