Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: Gentoo vs GNU toolchain (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Replacing cpu-feature USE flags)
Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2006 11:29:33
Message-Id: 1152357874.15448.13.camel@localhost
In Reply to: Re: Gentoo vs GNU toolchain (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Replacing cpu-feature USE flags) by "Harald van Dijk"
1 On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 23:09 +0200, Harald van Dijk wrote:
2 > On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 03:57:51PM -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
3 > > On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 20:40 +0200, Harald van Dijk wrote:
4 > > > On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 01:55:03PM -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
5 > > > > Keep pushing this and the only thing you will end up with is the
6 > > > > vanilla flag being removed all together..
7 > > >
8 > > > Is that a threat? If not, is there a reason behind this?
9 > >
10 > > Yes.. When users or devs complain non stop when they
11 > > don't understand something it leaves us with a few choices.
12 > > 1) put up with people not having a clue.
13 > > 2) remove the option so they can't bitch about it.
14 > >
15 > > Option #1 is not fun as it pushes the hand on #2
16 >
17 > Option 3: Enlighten me. I have explained why I feel the way I do, so if
18 > there's some big flaw in my understanding, please do correct it.
19
20 Sigh... I'm not going to sit here and bicker with you.
21 At the end of the day here is what matters..
22 Your giving Mike a hard time on the most vital of all
23 programs in this distro and that just sucks so please stop and
24 just be happy that the toolchain works as well as it does.
25
26 --
27 Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
28 Gentoo Linux
29
30 --
31 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list