Re: [gentoo-dev] impending c++11 clusterfuck?

[Michał Górny]

Dnia 30 listopada 2015 10:18:53 CET, "Gregory M. Turner" <gmt@×××××××.net> napisał(a):
>On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o>
>wrote:
>> On Sun, 29 Nov 2015 19:56:04 -0800
>> "Gregory M. Turner" <gmt@×××××××.net> wrote:
>> >  the mess gets magically cleaned up by robots somehow.
>>
>> Sadly := can't help here since gcc switches occur independently of
>> package installs. And AFAIK revdep-rebuild doesn't help either.
>
>Indeed... magical hand-wavey part is the only teeny-tiny flaw with my
>proposal that the problem be magically, hand-wavically solved --
>otherwise, it's rock-solid :)
>
>OTOH when you're spending ten hours a week waiting for revdep-rebuild,
>preserved-rebuild stops seeming like an intractable fantasy and more
>like an interesting puzzle you'd might as well take a crack at
>solving.

It won't help either since SONAME doesn't change. And as would Ciaran say, it's the wrong solution to a different problem.

>
>I dunno about y'all but my not-really-that-computationally-powerful
>workstation has 2000 packages installed, about three-quarters of which
>seem to have forked webkit (just kidding, but it sure feels that way).
>
>emerge -e @world literally takes me two days if I'm lucky.  If I'm
>not, more like a week, with my cores left mostly idling while my
>productivity is thwarted by various non-webkit-compiling distractions
>like using the toilet or working.
>
>Point being, it's damn slow; I'm starting to feel like the guy waiting
>for revdep-rebuild all week.  There's gotta be a way to do it.  If it
>requires some encapsulation-breaking hacks to get it done (as
>preserved-rebuild kinda did) it's probably well worth it.
>
>-gmt
>
>Greg Turner
>gmt@×××××××.net

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.