Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:05:58
Message-Id: CAGfcS_mL=9idFCTH5LRBrcPhHi+cx55aZtj+wotG8QjJFz30hA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider by Patrick Lauer
1 On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> wrote:
2 > The whole discussion, which seems to turn everyone into a raging
3 > squirrel, is about changing the default provider of a virtual. All other
4 > providers will continue being listed and available. The change affects
5 > none of the current userbase (who seem to have a preference for eudev if
6 > forums polls have any meaning).
7
8 Why is it that anytime there is a great debate over something somebody
9 says something like the following:
10
11 This decision is completely trivial and won't really change anything.
12 That is why it is so critical that we make this decision right now!
13
14 Either it matters or it doesn't...
15
16 --
17 Rich

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o>