Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:27:10
Message-Id: 56C38606.7060209@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider by Rich Freeman
1 On 2/16/16 3:05 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
2 > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> wrote:
3 >> The whole discussion, which seems to turn everyone into a raging
4 >> squirrel, is about changing the default provider of a virtual. All other
5 >> providers will continue being listed and available. The change affects
6 >> none of the current userbase (who seem to have a preference for eudev if
7 >> forums polls have any meaning).
8 >
9 > Why is it that anytime there is a great debate over something somebody
10 > says something like the following:
11
12 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6rI8mDpnv7c
13
14 >
15 > This decision is completely trivial and won't really change anything.
16 > That is why it is so critical that we make this decision right now!
17 >
18 > Either it matters or it doesn't...
19 >
20
21
22 --
23 Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
24 Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
25 E-Mail : blueness@g.o
26 GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
27 GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o>