| 1 |
Quoting Mike Kelly <pioto@g.o>: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Thu, 17 May 2007 00:37:23 +0200 |
| 4 |
> Thilo Bangert <bangert@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
... |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
>> > IMHO app-vim/ant should really be app-vim/vim-ant or something other |
| 8 |
>> > than just ant. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> or app-vim/sudo-syntax and app-vim/ant-syntax as there already are a |
| 11 |
>> number of ebuilds following that scheme... |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Well, sudo and ant aren't syntax plugins, so that wouldn't make any |
| 14 |
> sense. Also, we're keeping the same names that the upstream script |
| 15 |
> writers use, just as we do everywhere else in Gentoo. The whole point |
| 16 |
> of having category names is so that we can have two packages w/ the |
| 17 |
> same name and not have issues. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
All this is so familiar... where have I heard that before? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/27770/focus=27838 |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
The thread is pretty long, but some of the issues of the current |
| 24 |
thread have been covered in length there. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Georgi |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
---------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 30 |
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives