| 1 |
On Thu, 17 May 2007 00:37:23 +0200 |
| 2 |
Thilo Bangert <bangert@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> > > It isn't different. That's the problem. If you have two packages |
| 5 |
> > > with the same name, you have the same problem. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > On that note I would hope the vim/vi peeps would rename. |
| 8 |
> > app-vim/ant |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> and app-vim/sudo |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
That's getting the axe in a few weeks. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> > IMHO app-vim/ant should really be app-vim/vim-ant or something other |
| 15 |
> > than just ant. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> or app-vim/sudo-syntax and app-vim/ant-syntax as there already are a |
| 18 |
> number of ebuilds following that scheme... |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Well, sudo and ant aren't syntax plugins, so that wouldn't make any |
| 21 |
sense. Also, we're keeping the same names that the upstream script |
| 22 |
writers use, just as we do everywhere else in Gentoo. The whole point |
| 23 |
of having category names is so that we can have two packages w/ the |
| 24 |
same name and not have issues. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Mike Kelly |
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives