Archives
Archives
| From: | Thilo Bangert <bangert@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages with same name was -> Conversion of Emacs virtual packages | ||
| Date: | Wed, 16 May 2007 22:44:59 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200705170037.26212.bangert@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages with same name was -> Conversion of Emacs virtual packages by "William L. Thomson Jr." |
||
| 1 | > > It isn't different. That's the problem. If you have two packages |
| 2 | > > with the same name, you have the same problem. |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > On that note I would hope the vim/vi peeps would rename. |
| 5 | > app-vim/ant |
| 6 | |
| 7 | and app-vim/sudo |
| 8 | |
| 9 | > IMHO app-vim/ant should really be app-vim/vim-ant or something other |
| 10 | > than just ant. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | or app-vim/sudo-syntax and app-vim/ant-syntax as there already are a |
| 13 | number of ebuilds following that scheme... |
| 14 | |
| 15 | regards |
| 16 | Thilo |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages with same name was -> Conversion of Emacs virtual packages | Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o> |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages with same name was -> Conversion of Emacs virtual packages | Ali Polatel <polatel@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages with same name was -> Conversion of Emacs virtual packages | Mike Kelly <pioto@g.o> |