| 1 |
you make a good point. After further thought, I have come to the |
| 2 |
conclusion that an official |
| 3 |
wiki instead of xml guide might not be a good idea since we would not be |
| 4 |
able to guarantee the |
| 5 |
accuracy of the information contained in it. i think we should be able to |
| 6 |
replace the wiki with the xml guide format once the MacOS project becomes |
| 7 |
more mature. On the other hand, It might still be good to have an |
| 8 |
supplementary official |
| 9 |
wiki with an accuracy disclaimer. That sounds like an ok idea to me, |
| 10 |
although i don't have my heart set on it, and I could be persuaded to |
| 11 |
believe the opposite if any of you make good points to the contrary |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
On Sun, 8 Aug 2004, Hasan Khalil wrote: |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> Lance Albertson wrote: |
| 16 |
> > Why not just create official documentation? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> I completely agree that official documentation should be in guide xml |
| 19 |
> standard, and should be available on the docs section of the gentoo.org |
| 20 |
> site. Unofficial documentation, then, should either be on |
| 21 |
> gentoo-wiki.com, or a more official alternative. Unofficial |
| 22 |
> documentation for starting projects like Gentoo for Mac OS X is |
| 23 |
> important (particularly in wiki form) because user findings are central |
| 24 |
> to further development in the system, and community contributions have |
| 25 |
> sped the project along more than many development efforts have. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> I welcome any criticism in this matter. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> -Hasan |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> -- |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> Hasan Khalil <gongloo@g.o> |
| 34 |
> Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x707B8F18 |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives