1 |
Dale wrote: |
2 |
> Niklas Bolander wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> On Friday 23 December 2005 20:59, Peter wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>>>> I can tell you that I would be disappointed if this replaces the |
8 |
>>>> current |
9 |
>>>> ebuilds, because I really don't need to reinstall nvidia-settings and |
10 |
>>>> nvidia-glx every time I build a new kernel. |
11 |
>>>> |
12 |
>>> |
13 |
>>> That's why we are having this dialog. When I proposed doing a unified |
14 |
>>> ebuild, the objective always was to get and encourage feedback. If |
15 |
>>> you are |
16 |
>>> happy keeping up with three ebuilds, then that is feedback we need to |
17 |
>>> have. BTW, please post these comments to the bug report. |
18 |
>>> |
19 |
>>> |
20 |
>>> |
21 |
>>>>> We hope you will find this approach a more streamlined and easy |
22 |
>>>>> implementation for nVidia. |
23 |
>>>>> |
24 |
>>>> |
25 |
>>>> I don't particularly see how it is easier. |
26 |
>>>> |
27 |
>>> |
28 |
>>> But many do. This mirrors the approach nvidia takes. |
29 |
>>> |
30 |
>>> |
31 |
>> |
32 |
>> |
33 |
>> As another non-dev/user I must say that three separate ebuilds is |
34 |
>> preferable. The kernel ebuild must be recompiled every time I change |
35 |
>> kernel while the glx only needs to be installed once. Finaly, I have |
36 |
>> rather bad experiences of nvidia-settings and would like to avoid them |
37 |
>> at all. |
38 |
>> |
39 |
>> Wouldn't it be more sensible to make a nvidia-meta build that pulled |
40 |
>> in all three if the goal is pure simplicity? |
41 |
>> Merry Christmas btw. |
42 |
>> |
43 |
>> /Niklas |
44 |
>> |
45 |
>> |
46 |
> I have to agree. Do it sort of like KDE, with kde, kde-meta or as |
47 |
> seperate packages. Have it so you can pull in all three in one emerge |
48 |
> command but have the option to do it seperately as well. I have only |
49 |
> emerged glx once and do the nvidia-kernel when I change kernels. I |
50 |
> really don't have any use for the settings package, as long as my GUI |
51 |
> works anyway. |
52 |
> |
53 |
> Just give us some options. We'll be happy then. |
54 |
> |
55 |
|
56 |
Ditto. A unified build would make more work for my tired old CPU. A meta |
57 |
build would be better, give us the choice to pull it all in or one at a |
58 |
time like kde. |
59 |
|
60 |
|
61 |
ps. I appreciate the original intention of trying to clean this up. Thanks! |
62 |
-- |
63 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |