| 1 |
> On Mar 30, 2015, at 10:18 AM, Alexandre Rostovtsev <tetromino@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:54 -0500, Tom Gall wrote: |
| 4 |
>> Hi All, |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> Sorry for the trouble. My cvs history foo is a little weak but it appears that someone went out and did some deleting in profiles/arch/arm64 of some WIP things without bothering to email, irc or otherwise communicate. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> A) Could the guilty party come forward? |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> B) If there was something objectionable I’d like to understand what your concern is. |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> C) Helping out with arm64 is most welcome, please just don’t be pulling nails from parts of the building under construction…. |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> Thanks! |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> Tom |
| 17 |
>> tgall_foo aka CaptHammer |
| 18 |
>> arm64 arch lead |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Don't know about profiles, but considering a long series of recent |
| 21 |
> commits without a gpg signature [1] |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Obscure gpg-agent errors are so much fun. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
> and without ECHANGELOG_USER [2], you |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Already fixed. Joys of doing commits on a fresh gentoo arm64 install. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
> might have done something in /profiles that looked like "committing |
| 30 |
> while drunk", and one of your fellow devs was compelled to revert ;) |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Very much doubt it. The list of arm64 devs I can count on one hand. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
> [1] https://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/sys-kernel/linux-headers/Manifest?r1=1.568&r2=1.569 |
| 35 |
> [2] https://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/sys-kernel/linux-headers/ChangeLog?revision=1.431&view=markup |
| 36 |
> |
Archives