From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade | ||
Date: | Sun, 06 May 2007 18:25:19 | ||
Message-Id: | 20070506192102.443d121e@snowflake | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade by Dan Meltzer |
1 | On Sun, 6 May 2007 14:17:29 -0400 |
2 | Dan Meltzer <hydrogen@×××××××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 | > > > which elog could easily be extended to do. |
4 | > > |
5 | > > But which elog does not do by default, and for good reason. |
6 | > |
7 | > and what good reason would that be? |
8 | |
9 | That elog is designed for post-install messages that aren't necessarily |
10 | relevant to many users. |
11 | |
12 | -- |
13 | Ciaran McCreesh |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade | Dan Meltzer <hydrogen@×××××××××××××××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade | expose@×××××××××××.net |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade | Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> |