Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade
Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 18:25:19
Message-Id: 20070506192102.443d121e@snowflake
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade by Dan Meltzer
1 On Sun, 6 May 2007 14:17:29 -0400
2 Dan Meltzer <hydrogen@×××××××××××××××××.com> wrote:
3 > > > which elog could easily be extended to do.
4 > >
5 > > But which elog does not do by default, and for good reason.
6 >
7 > and what good reason would that be?
8
9 That elog is designed for post-install messages that aren't necessarily
10 relevant to many users.
11
12 --
13 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade Dan Meltzer <hydrogen@×××××××××××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade expose@×××××××××××.net
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com>