Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Dan Meltzer <hydrogen@×××××××××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade
Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 18:20:27
Message-Id: 200705061417.29880.hydrogen@notyetimplemented.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On Sunday 06 May 2007 2:11:14 pm Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > On Sun, 6 May 2007 14:08:01 -0400
3 >
4 > Dan Meltzer <hydrogen@×××××××××××××××××.com> wrote:
5 > > On Sunday 06 May 2007 1:58:57 pm Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
6 > > > On Sun, 06 May 2007 10:38:14 -0700
7 > > >
8 > > > Mike Doty <kingtaco@g.o> wrote:
9 > > > > how is that different than using e{info,warn,error}?
10 > > >
11 > > > It stays visible until the user explicitly acknowledges reading it.
12 > >
13 > > which elog could easily be extended to do.
14 >
15 > But which elog does not do by default, and for good reason.
16
17 and what good reason would that be?
18
19
20 --
21 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>