Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade | ||
| Date: | Sun, 06 May 2007 18:15:47 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20070506191114.15991c45@snowflake | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade by Dan Meltzer |
||
| 1 | On Sun, 6 May 2007 14:08:01 -0400 |
| 2 | Dan Meltzer <hydrogen@×××××××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 | > On Sunday 06 May 2007 1:58:57 pm Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 | > > On Sun, 06 May 2007 10:38:14 -0700 |
| 5 | > > |
| 6 | > > Mike Doty <kingtaco@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 | > > > how is that different than using e{info,warn,error}? |
| 8 | > > |
| 9 | > > It stays visible until the user explicitly acknowledges reading it. |
| 10 | > |
| 11 | > which elog could easily be extended to do. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | But which elog does not do by default, and for good reason. |
| 14 | |
| 15 | -- |
| 16 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade | Dan Meltzer <hydrogen@×××××××××××××××××.com> |