Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Interaction in ebuilds - bad idea?
Date: Sat, 01 May 2004 21:04:00
Message-Id: 200405012303.55936.pauldv@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Interaction in ebuilds - bad idea? by Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
1 On Saturday 01 May 2004 21:52, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard wrote:
2 > Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o> writes:
3 > > [snip]
4 > >
5 > >> Like I said, it would only have to ask for information that wasn't
6 > >> available from the cache of answers. Provided there was a tool to
7 > >> pre-edit the cache - something I suggested earlier - then your scenarios
8 > >> would work.
9 > >
10 > > I agree with such a setup. Have a way in which - optionally - the ebuild
11 > > can be preconfigured. This configuration would need to be selfcontained
12 > > in such a way that the configuration files can be copied and created at
13 > > any time.
14 >
15 > I much prefer requiring pre-configuration. I don't like the idea of
16 > emerge being interactive under any circumstance.
17
18 The optional (for the user, not the ebuild developer) configuration would
19 happen before anything is downloaded, unpacked or compiled. Alternatively it
20 should be possible to do this for a lot of hosts at the same time and just
21 copy the configuration file(s) like what is possible with package.use
22
23 Paul
24
25 --
26 Paul de Vrieze
27 Gentoo Developer
28 Mail: pauldv@g.o
29 Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net