| 1 |
On Sunday 22 August 2004 20:51, Jon Portnoy wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 08:46:09PM +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Hi, |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > Do we already have a tool for generating a list of DEPS that need |
| 6 |
> > keywording so that a package can be marked stable on any given arch? |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > If not, I'll post details tomorrow about one that I've knocked up to do |
| 9 |
> > just that. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Repoman? 8) |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
If repoman is enough for the job, why do I have at least one arch team stating |
| 14 |
that they expect me (who can't run repoman on their arch) to produce a list |
| 15 |
of the DEPs that need marking as stable? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Best regards, |
| 18 |
Stu |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Stuart Herbert stuart@g.o |
| 21 |
Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/ |
| 22 |
http://stu.gnqs.org/diary/ |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
GnuPG key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu |
| 25 |
Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C |
| 26 |
-- |
Archives