1 |
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 21:38:00 +0100 Stuart Herbert <stuart@g.o> |
2 |
wrote: |
3 |
| If repoman is enough for the job, why do I have at least one arch team |
4 |
| stating that they expect me (who can't run repoman on their arch) to |
5 |
| produce a list of the DEPs that need marking as stable? |
6 |
|
7 |
Either you spend five minutes building a list for all of us, or every |
8 |
single member of every arch team spends five minutes building a list for |
9 |
themselves (here's a hint: we're going to do the bugs that make it easy |
10 |
for us and ignore the ones that look like a major pain in the ass). If |
11 |
you want something marked stable, we expect you to do at least the basic |
12 |
groundwork rather than telling us to go figure it out from some code |
13 |
which you'll probably be changing shortly. |
14 |
|
15 |
Oh, and repoman is now arch neutral. You should know that. |
16 |
|
17 |
-- |
18 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Sparc, MIPS, Vim, Fluxbox) |
19 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
20 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |