1 |
I rebooted now, and I cannot log into the system, It says invalid login |
2 |
with any userid that I enter. I've go the latest shadow package. Is |
3 |
there anything else that I need? |
4 |
|
5 |
Rick |
6 |
|
7 |
P.S. |
8 |
Remember I'm the guy who rebuilt his system with gcc 3.0.3. |
9 |
|
10 |
On Sun, 2002-01-20 at 21:55, Richard Reich wrote: |
11 |
> I'm building my system with gcc 3.0.3. I've got most packages compiled |
12 |
> but I've run into a few with problems... |
13 |
> |
14 |
> First BitchX won't compile by default, I had to do a dirty hack to fix |
15 |
> it. While it was compiling I had to edit |
16 |
> /var/tmp/portage/bitchx-1.0.18-r4/work/BitchX/source/modules.c and |
17 |
> comment out the line extern unsigned <somthing> bitchx_<somthing>ver. |
18 |
> The reason is there is a duplicate decleration in irc.h. Sorry I cannot |
19 |
> supply the <something> because the file has been deleted after a |
20 |
> sucessfull merge. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Next is glibc, aparently there is some check and it won't compile under |
23 |
> gcc 3.0.3 only 2.95 here is the exact message I get... |
24 |
> |
25 |
> *** This version of GNU libc cannot be compiled by GCC 3.x. |
26 |
> *** GCC 3.x will generate a library that is binary incompatible to |
27 |
> *** older and future releases of GNU libc. |
28 |
> *** You should compile this GNU libc release by an older GCC version |
29 |
> *** or wait for the next GNU libc release. |
30 |
> *** If you really mean to use GCC 3.x, run configure again |
31 |
> *** using the extra parameter `--disable-sanity-checks'. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> !!! ERROR: The ebuild did not complete successfully. |
34 |
> !!! Function src_compile, Line 15, Exitcode 1 |
35 |
> !!! (no error message) |
36 |
> |
37 |
> !!! emerge aborting on |
38 |
> /usr/portage/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.2.4-r9.ebuild . |
39 |
> |
40 |
> Now, I've tried the --disable-sanity-checks but emerge gives me an |
41 |
> error... |
42 |
> loki portage # emerge sys-libs/glibc/ --disable-sanity-checks |
43 |
> !!! Error: --disable-sanity-checks is an invalid option. |
44 |
> |
45 |
> |
46 |
> Any ideas on how to fix this? |
47 |
> |
48 |
> Now I haven't rebooted my machine yet, for some reason su doesn't work |
49 |
> either, for normal users that is, root just ignores the errors. Here is |
50 |
> the specific error... |
51 |
> sh-2.05a$ su |
52 |
> su: Module is unknown |
53 |
> Sorry. |
54 |
> sh-2.05a$ |
55 |
> |
56 |
> |
57 |
> Here is a list of the other modules that did not compile... |
58 |
> /usr/portage/app-admin/fam-oss/fam-oss-2.6.4-r1.ebuild |
59 |
> /usr/portage/kde-base/kdelibs/kdelibs-2.2.2-r2.ebuild |
60 |
> /usr/portage/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.2.4-r9.ebuild |
61 |
> /usr/portage/sys-libs/ncurses/ncurses-5.2-r3.ebuild |
62 |
> /usr/portage/dev-libs/pilot-link/pilot-link-0.9.6-r3.ebuild |
63 |
> /usr/portage/net-misc/netkit-telnetd/netkit-telnetd-0.17-r1.ebuild |
64 |
> |
65 |
> |
66 |
> Some of the packages that did build are... |
67 |
> X, gnome, evolution, xchat, mozilla, galeon... There are others but I |
68 |
> won't list them here. I have logs of all my building if anybody wants |
69 |
> them. Also I'm going to keep this setup if I can even limp through it. |
70 |
> I use gcc 3.0.3 as my development compiler, and I'd like to use gentoo |
71 |
> as my primary test platform. So I'd be willing to act as a tester for |
72 |
> the 3.0.3 compiler. |
73 |
> |
74 |
> DISCLAIMER: I do know that 3.0.3 is not supported by the gentoo team, |
75 |
> this is something that I undertook on my own. There were too reasons, |
76 |
> 1. I'm sick and twisted when it comes to *NEEDING* the beeding edge |
77 |
> 2. I use 3.0.3 as my compiler. |
78 |
> |
79 |
> If any of this helps great! If not and I'm being a nusance tell me to go |
80 |
> away and I'll go sit in the corner with my gcc 3.0.3 ;) |
81 |
> |
82 |
> Rick |
83 |
> |
84 |
> _______________________________________________ |
85 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
86 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
87 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
88 |
> |