| 1 |
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 11:27 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> > Well, then it should be updated to match current Portage behaviour. |
| 3 |
> > PMS is not supposed to document "How portage worked at one point of |
| 4 |
> > time" or "The intersection of the capabilities of Portage and |
| 5 |
> > Paludis". It should follow the current portage's behaviour as closely |
| 6 |
> > as possible. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Do you really want to make it impossible to install Gentoo using the |
| 9 |
> most recent official release? Because that's what will happen if we do |
| 10 |
> what you're suggesting... |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Considering that the "most recent official release" is 2008.0_beta2, I |
| 13 |
don't see where you have a point, at all. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Sure, you're going to mention something about being labeled a beta, to |
| 16 |
which my response will be that you're simply backpedaling and changing |
| 17 |
the facts to suit your needs. After all, looking at /releases on the |
| 18 |
mirrors, I see a nice and shiny 2008.0_beta2 on all of the |
| 19 |
officially-supported arches. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Isn't it about time that you gave up on your little mission to |
| 22 |
consistently undermine the hard work put in by a community of |
| 23 |
volunteers? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Of course not... You need to stroke your ego some more. Pfft... |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 29 |
Release Engineering Strategic Lead |
| 30 |
Games Developer |
Archives