Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: David Leverton <levertond@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Agenda [WAS: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June]
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 05:53:01
Message-Id: 200806190652.48744.levertond@googlemail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Agenda [WAS: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June] by Chris Gianelloni
1 On Thursday 19 June 2008 01:23:33 Chris Gianelloni wrote:
2 > Considering that the "most recent official release" is 2008.0_beta2, I
3 > don't see where you have a point, at all.
4
5 http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/releng/#doc_chap5
6
7 "The latest release of Gentoo Linux is:
8
9 "Gentoo Linux 2007.0 for Alpha, AMD64, HPPA, IA64, MIPS, PPC, S390, SH, SPARC,
10 and x86 architectures. "
11
12 2007.0 is also the first version listed at
13 http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/where.xml
14
15 The point is to avoid breaking Portage versions that users might reasonably be
16 using, even if only briefly. Do you really expect /all/ users doing a new
17 installation to choose the scary beta instead of the nice safe release?
18 Perhaps we all know that the beta is better because it's so much more up to
19 date. Maybe it's even just as stable, if not more so (I wouldn't know, I
20 haven't tried it). But as long as it's labelled "beta", at least some people
21 are going to avoid it in favour of 2007.0, and breaking the tree for those
22 people such that they can't upgrade is unacceptable.
23 --
24 gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list

Replies