1 |
On Thursday 19 June 2008 01:23:33 Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
2 |
> Considering that the "most recent official release" is 2008.0_beta2, I |
3 |
> don't see where you have a point, at all. |
4 |
|
5 |
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/releng/#doc_chap5 |
6 |
|
7 |
"The latest release of Gentoo Linux is: |
8 |
|
9 |
"Gentoo Linux 2007.0 for Alpha, AMD64, HPPA, IA64, MIPS, PPC, S390, SH, SPARC, |
10 |
and x86 architectures. " |
11 |
|
12 |
2007.0 is also the first version listed at |
13 |
http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/where.xml |
14 |
|
15 |
The point is to avoid breaking Portage versions that users might reasonably be |
16 |
using, even if only briefly. Do you really expect /all/ users doing a new |
17 |
installation to choose the scary beta instead of the nice safe release? |
18 |
Perhaps we all know that the beta is better because it's so much more up to |
19 |
date. Maybe it's even just as stable, if not more so (I wouldn't know, I |
20 |
haven't tried it). But as long as it's labelled "beta", at least some people |
21 |
are going to avoid it in favour of 2007.0, and breaking the tree for those |
22 |
people such that they can't upgrade is unacceptable. |
23 |
-- |
24 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |