Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Agenda [WAS: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June]
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:41:04
Message-Id: 485A0DAE.7020304@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Agenda [WAS: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June] by David Leverton
1 David Leverton wrote:
2 > On Thursday 19 June 2008 01:23:33 Chris Gianelloni wrote:
3 >> Considering that the "most recent official release" is 2008.0_beta2, I
4 >> don't see where you have a point, at all.
5 >
6 > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/releng/#doc_chap5
7 >
8 > "The latest release of Gentoo Linux is:
9 >
10 > "Gentoo Linux 2007.0 for Alpha, AMD64, HPPA, IA64, MIPS, PPC, S390, SH, SPARC,
11 > and x86 architectures. "
12 >
13 > 2007.0 is also the first version listed at
14 > http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/where.xml
15 >
16
17 Good point, doc team please update those places.
18
19 > The point is to avoid breaking Portage versions that users might reasonably be
20 > using, even if only briefly. Do you really expect /all/ users doing a new
21 > installation to choose the scary beta instead of the nice safe release?
22
23 What about those who do not update since 1.0? how could they survive the
24 havoc?
25
26 Well I do have my opinion about this:
27
28 http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero/glep/migrationpath.rst
29
30 IFF we would like to be _that_ helpful for such minority of users.
31 Otherwise isn't that hard update portage in safe mode anyway.
32
33 Trying to make HUGE MONSTERS of little corner case is the favorite sport
34 of Ciaranm and crew, be it a "beta" tag, an obscure feature some
35 developers may like for tracking live sources (and the user should not
36 use), possible fut{ure,ile} changes in the ebuild format.
37
38 lu - putting in perspective
39
40 --
41
42 Luca Barbato
43 Gentoo Council Member
44 Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
45 http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
46
47 --
48 gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list

Replies