1 |
David Leverton wrote: |
2 |
> On Thursday 19 June 2008 01:23:33 Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
3 |
>> Considering that the "most recent official release" is 2008.0_beta2, I |
4 |
>> don't see where you have a point, at all. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/releng/#doc_chap5 |
7 |
> |
8 |
> "The latest release of Gentoo Linux is: |
9 |
> |
10 |
> "Gentoo Linux 2007.0 for Alpha, AMD64, HPPA, IA64, MIPS, PPC, S390, SH, SPARC, |
11 |
> and x86 architectures. " |
12 |
> |
13 |
> 2007.0 is also the first version listed at |
14 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/where.xml |
15 |
> |
16 |
|
17 |
Good point, doc team please update those places. |
18 |
|
19 |
> The point is to avoid breaking Portage versions that users might reasonably be |
20 |
> using, even if only briefly. Do you really expect /all/ users doing a new |
21 |
> installation to choose the scary beta instead of the nice safe release? |
22 |
|
23 |
What about those who do not update since 1.0? how could they survive the |
24 |
havoc? |
25 |
|
26 |
Well I do have my opinion about this: |
27 |
|
28 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero/glep/migrationpath.rst |
29 |
|
30 |
IFF we would like to be _that_ helpful for such minority of users. |
31 |
Otherwise isn't that hard update portage in safe mode anyway. |
32 |
|
33 |
Trying to make HUGE MONSTERS of little corner case is the favorite sport |
34 |
of Ciaranm and crew, be it a "beta" tag, an obscure feature some |
35 |
developers may like for tracking live sources (and the user should not |
36 |
use), possible fut{ure,ile} changes in the ebuild format. |
37 |
|
38 |
lu - putting in perspective |
39 |
|
40 |
-- |
41 |
|
42 |
Luca Barbato |
43 |
Gentoo Council Member |
44 |
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC |
45 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |
46 |
|
47 |
-- |
48 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |