Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: David Leverton <levertond@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Agenda [WAS: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June]
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 08:04:49
Message-Id: 200806190904.44195.levertond@googlemail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Agenda [WAS: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June] by Luca Barbato
1 On Thursday 19 June 2008 08:41:34 Luca Barbato wrote:
2 > > The point is to avoid breaking Portage versions that users might
3 > > reasonably be using, even if only briefly. Do you really expect /all/
4 > > users doing a new installation to choose the scary beta instead of the
5 > > nice safe release?
6 >
7 > What about those who do not update since 1.0? how could they survive the
8 > havoc?
9
10 Is avoiding a beta version of something moderately important (like, say,
11 installation media) really equivalent to not updating for over five years?
12
13 > Trying to make HUGE MONSTERS of little corner case is the favorite sport
14 > of Ciaranm and crew, be it a "beta" tag, an obscure feature some
15 > developers may like for tracking live sources (and the user should not
16 > use), possible fut{ure,ile} changes in the ebuild format.
17
18 Please take the ad hominems elsewhere.
19 --
20 gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list