Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Stuart Herbert <stuart@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] tentative x86 arch team glep
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 21:59:12
Message-Id: 1125870843.11366.155.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] tentative x86 arch team glep by Jason Wever
1 On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 15:45 -0600, Jason Wever wrote:
2 > This is the current policy, though it gets violated quite often.
3
4 Maybe the answer is to have separate trees for arches and general
5 packages then? That would be one solution.
6
7 (Although not one that I'd personally prefer. I'd rather the package
8 maintainers learned to work within the rules instead.)
9
10 Best regards,
11 Stu
12 --
13 Stuart Herbert stuart@g.o
14 Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/
15 http://stu.gnqs.org/diary/
16
17 GnuGP key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu
18 Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C
19 --

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] tentative x86 arch team glep Jason Wever <weeve@g.o>