Archives
Archives
| From: | Jason Wever <weeve@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] tentative x86 arch team glep | ||
| Date: | Sun, 04 Sep 2005 21:49:28 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20050904154552.4c7d1313@enterprise.weeve.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] tentative x86 arch team glep by Stuart Herbert |
||
| 1 | On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 22:39:44 +0100 |
| 2 | Stuart Herbert <stuart@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > Yes, but if package maintainers aren't allowed to mark packages as |
| 5 | > stable on anything but the "maintainer arch" (unless they are also a |
| 6 | > member of an arch team), this problem shouldn't happen. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | This is the current policy, though it gets violated quite often. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Cheers, |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Jason Wever |
| 13 | Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] tentative x86 arch team glep | Stuart Herbert <stuart@g.o> |