Archives
Archives
| From: | Francesco Riosa <vivo75@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] force verbose build log as per PMS policy? | ||
| Date: | Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:44:32 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAD6zcDxFUCiHCxxOW2dSHqPhN-MhPzRujz6DT9+W=H3Luy8koA@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] force verbose build log as per PMS policy? by hasufell |
||
| 1 | +1 for verbosity |
| 2 | |
| 3 | Il giorno 01/ago/2012 13:21, "hasufell" <hasufell@g.o> ha scritto: |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > We already had a discussion about cmake-utils.eclass and forcing verbose |
| 6 | > build log for that which was approved: |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_ce7d33748936663e84a5463fbf7f4d39.xml |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | > Also we have bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384193 and |
| 11 | > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379497 |
| 12 | > |
| 13 | > I opened a tracker https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429308 |
| 14 | > |
| 15 | > Some devs seem unsure about that or want to have a council vote on that |
| 16 | > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429332 |
| 17 | > |
| 18 | > |
| 19 | > When I sum that up again... |
| 20 | > - we are on gentoo and need as much information as possible for |
| 21 | > backtracing, resolving bugs, checking whether CFLAGS and such have been |
| 22 | > respected |
| 23 | > - no need to tell the user to recompile with |
| 24 | > EXTRA_ECONF="--disable-silent-rules" or similar just to be able to help |
| 25 | him |
| 26 | > - some QA checks might depend on verbose build log and are not yet |
| 27 | > implemented therefor |
| 28 | > - if people want nice build _output_ (not log), they can use --quiet-build |
| 29 | > |