| 1 |
On 06/21/2013 01:26 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 2 |
> Thanks for the explanation. But I think that, currently, the only |
| 3 |
> remaining "objection" is whether play with /sbin/init (that needs |
| 4 |
> sysvinit to be changed if I don't misremember) or with /sbin/einit. |
| 5 |
> Looks like mgorny has shown some problems on relying on "einit" instead |
| 6 |
> of plain "init" regarding to fallback :/ |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I prefer having /sbin/init used for the pivot since /sbin/einit is a bit |
| 9 |
more brittle and as Fabio did the whole machinery is _still_ opt-in. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
lu |
Archives