| 1 |
Hi Ciaran, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Can you please refrain from making inflammatory accusations in your |
| 4 |
posts? This is not a forum for airing personal grievances, and they do |
| 5 |
not serve any purpose besides encouraging others to do the same to you |
| 6 |
- as you have discovered. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
-Daniel |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
On 2/20/07, Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org> wrote: |
| 11 |
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:46:32 +0100 Francesco Riosa <vivo@g.o> |
| 12 |
> wrote: |
| 13 |
> | Better protect gentoo and it's developer, especially the more active |
| 14 |
> | ones from the gravitational waves of those few, very annoying |
| 15 |
> | satellites. Then it will be possible to actually work to the rest. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> You mean the developers who try to blackmail devrel into firing people |
| 18 |
> they don't like? The developers who go around abusing arch teams at |
| 19 |
> every given opportunity because they won't do exactly what that person |
| 20 |
> wants when he wants it? The developers who manage to make a huge deal |
| 21 |
> out of fixing up some small package by blogging about it incessantly |
| 22 |
> instead of doing real work? The developers who resort to childish |
| 23 |
> personal attacks like misspelling someone's name whilst skipping all |
| 24 |
> factual content in their replies? The developers who refuse to |
| 25 |
> handle bugs submitted by people they don't like? |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> I agree entirely. Gentoo does need to be protected from those kinds of |
| 28 |
> people. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> -- |
| 31 |
> Ciaran McCreesh |
| 32 |
> Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org |
| 33 |
> Web : http://ciaranm.org/ |
| 34 |
> Paludis, the secure package manager : http://paludis.pioto.org/ |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives