| 1 |
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:46:32 +0100 Francesco Riosa <vivo@g.o> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
| Better protect gentoo and it's developer, especially the more active |
| 4 |
| ones from the gravitational waves of those few, very annoying |
| 5 |
| satellites. Then it will be possible to actually work to the rest. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
You mean the developers who try to blackmail devrel into firing people |
| 8 |
they don't like? The developers who go around abusing arch teams at |
| 9 |
every given opportunity because they won't do exactly what that person |
| 10 |
wants when he wants it? The developers who manage to make a huge deal |
| 11 |
out of fixing up some small package by blogging about it incessantly |
| 12 |
instead of doing real work? The developers who resort to childish |
| 13 |
personal attacks like misspelling someone's name whilst skipping all |
| 14 |
factual content in their replies? The developers who refuse to |
| 15 |
handle bugs submitted by people they don't like? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I agree entirely. Gentoo does need to be protected from those kinds of |
| 18 |
people. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
| 22 |
Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org |
| 23 |
Web : http://ciaranm.org/ |
| 24 |
Paludis, the secure package manager : http://paludis.pioto.org/ |
Archives