Archives
Archives
| From: | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] libusb-compat preference in virtual/libusb:0 not strong enough? | ||
| Date: | Mon, 11 Feb 2013 17:09:29 | ||
| Message-Id: | 511925BE.6050301@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] libusb-compat preference in virtual/libusb:0 not strong enough? by Peter Stuge |
||
| 1 | On 02/11/2013 08:54 AM, Peter Stuge wrote: |
| 2 | > Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: |
| 3 | >> it's because of what Maxim already said: it's not an LTR/RTL issue. |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > Do you have an idea about what the issue is? |
| 6 | |
| 7 | My guess is that there were one or more ebuilds that inappropriately |
| 8 | specified dev-libs/libusb:0 instead of virtual/libusb:0, and they have |
| 9 | since been fixed. |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | Thanks, |
| 12 | Zac |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] libusb-compat preference in virtual/libusb:0 not strong enough? | Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] libusb-compat preference in virtual/libusb:0 not strong enough? | Maxim Kammerer <mk@×××.su> |