| 1 |
On 11/18/2012 03:08 AM, Greg KH wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 02:54:38AM -0500, Richard Yao wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 05/09/2012 06:36 PM, Greg KH wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 08:51:37PM +0200, Fabio Erculiani wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>> I foresee a new udev fork then. |
| 6 |
>>> |
| 7 |
>>> Please feel free to do so, the code has been open since the first day I |
| 8 |
>>> created it. |
| 9 |
>>> |
| 10 |
>>> Remember, forks are good, there's nothing wrong with them, I strongly |
| 11 |
>>> encourage people to do them if they wish to, it benefits everyone |
| 12 |
>>> involved. |
| 13 |
>>> |
| 14 |
>>>> If udev is going to end up like avahi is, this is *highly* probable. |
| 15 |
>>> |
| 16 |
>>> That's an odd transition... |
| 17 |
>>> |
| 18 |
>>>> With "avahi is ..." I actually mean, one single tarball blob depending |
| 19 |
>>>> on the whole world and its solar system and galaxy. |
| 20 |
>>> |
| 21 |
>>> Hyperbole, how nice :( |
| 22 |
>>> |
| 23 |
>>>> Please stop throwing lennartware at people. FailAudio has been enough, thanks. |
| 24 |
>>> |
| 25 |
>>> The use of these terms is both rude and totally uncalled for. You |
| 26 |
>>> should be ashamed of yourself. |
| 27 |
>>> |
| 28 |
>>> Seriously, that's unacceptable behavior from anyone. |
| 29 |
>>> |
| 30 |
>>> No one forces you to use any of this software if you do not want to. |
| 31 |
>>> There are lots of other operating systems out there, feel free to switch |
| 32 |
>>> to them if you do not like the way this one is working out, no one is |
| 33 |
>>> stopping you. But for you to disparage someone who has given immense |
| 34 |
>>> bodies of work to the community, and you, for free, is horrible behavior |
| 35 |
>>> and needs to stop right now. |
| 36 |
>>> |
| 37 |
>>> greg k-h |
| 38 |
>>> |
| 39 |
>> |
| 40 |
>> Greg, would you clarify what you meant by this? |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
> Meant by what part of the above response? Written 6 months ago? |
| 43 |
> |
| 44 |
>> Your recent comments suggest to me that you did not mean what I thought |
| 45 |
>> you meant. |
| 46 |
> |
| 47 |
> What did you think I meant about what? |
| 48 |
> |
| 49 |
> Again, I have no objection to people forking projects, it's great, and |
| 50 |
> fun to watch happen. Fork away on your own site, with whom ever you |
| 51 |
> want to. |
| 52 |
> |
| 53 |
> But if this fork is now the "official Gentoo fork", owned by the Gentoo |
| 54 |
> Foundation, and it's the way forward that Gentoo the distro is going to |
| 55 |
> take with regards to how the boot process works on the system, then I |
| 56 |
> have something to say about it, as it affects me, a Gentoo developer. |
| 57 |
> |
| 58 |
> And that is how this thread started, I wanted to know what was the |
| 59 |
> resolution of the council meeting with the very unclear and vague |
| 60 |
> meeting minutes. I have yet to get that answer, which is troubling. |
| 61 |
> |
| 62 |
> thanks, |
| 63 |
> |
| 64 |
> greg k-h |
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
You are the one claiming that this is our official fork. None of us are. |
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
This will be an official Gentoo project when we make the announcement in |
| 69 |
the next few days. That makes it one project of many. GLEP 0039 clearly |
| 70 |
states how this works. If you are unhappy with GLEP 0039, then you |
| 71 |
should discuss that with the council. |
Archives